When you look at a bottle of
scotch whisky, which key elements on the label draw your interest? Is it the
word 'single malt'? Is it the age statement? Maybe it's the brand name? All of
these touch points we, as whisky drinkers, have become familiar with over time
and each is protected by a trade organisation called the Scotch Whisky Association
(SWA) in legal guidelines.
These guidelines are there to
protect you, the consumer, so what's written about on the label reflects
accurately what's in the bottle.
There is one area which the SWA
does not have any guidelines on and that is the use of E150a, caramel colouring
(other than to allow its use).
The addition to whisky of a
colouring agent is nothing new. Companies have been doing it for a long time
and those who do claim it has no taste side effects to the liquid and that its
use is purely to create consistency in the look of the liquid for the consumer.
However, aside from some local
laws in certain countries, when E150a is used the whisky producer is not
obliged to state on the label its inclusion, thus you have no way of knowing if
it has been used or not. Well, that is unless the producer chooses to tell you
and, in this age of traceability and authenticity, it's more likely that a
whisky company will tell you when they HAVEN'T
used it and some whisky producers actively state that they do not use any
colouring agents in their products.
One such whisky house to leave
their liquid 'au naturale' is The Macallan, who are releasing a new
range of whiskies created by The Macallan Whisky Maker Bob Dalgarno (left) which focus on colour, as opposed to age under the banner of The 1824 Series.
The four new offerings are all 'No
Age Statements' and named roughly after their own colours; Gold, Amber, Sienna
and Ruby. These are to be released in slightly different markets (Gold in the
UK and Canada, Amber in Europe and the other two pretty much everywhere) replacing
the 10 - 17 year old Sherry and Fine Oak offerings. This means that if you want
to buy a bottle of The Macallan with an age statement on the front, the
youngest will now be 18 Years Old (currently sitting at around £100 a bottle).
The new expressions will increase
in price as you go up through the range, with Gold starting at about £35 in the
UK (Amber being similarly price in Europe), Sienna being around £75 and Ruby
weighing in somewhere near the £125 price point. So, the darker the liquid, the
more expensive the whisky. But why?
Well, the justification for this
is that all casks act differently. So, The Macallan are saying that age is NOT
a great indicator of the flavour of the whisky; a fair point to make. I've had
40 year old whisky that could pass for 12 years old, and 4 year old whisky that
could pass for 40 year old whisky. It really DOES just depend on that
individual cask.
However, an age statement will
give some idea as to what the liquid
in the bottles tastes like, so if you remove the age statement (and the
whys-and-wherefores of that argument is a post in itself) there still must be
some way for you, the whisky consumer, to have an indication of the flavours
you'll get from the whisky you're buying. In this case The Macallan believe
that you'll be able to tell from the colour. The reason for the price hike
between colours is that, according to The Macallan, the more active casks which
give greater colour and greater intensity of flavour, are much more scarce.
Therefore, when creating an expression that is much darker / intense, the
liquid is harder to find.
No doubt this bold move of
creating 'wysiwyg' no age
statement whisky will spin off long debates across both the digital whisky
community and the printed press on the matter. (Engage us on twitter about it
if you like @WeHeartWhisky, or
on our facebook wall www.facebook.com/caskstrength) But the real key is the liquid. Is it any good?
The Macallan - Gold - 1824 Series -
NAS - 40% abv - £35-ish on release.
Nose: Honey and
lemons, hints of candied oranges and orange cream chocolates, all underpinned
with freshly baked flapjack.
Palate:
Orange blossom, juicy fruit chewing gum, lemon sherbet and some pineapple juice
tones. There is also an appley note to the palate. Really very easy drinking
and quite delicious.
Finish:
Hints of cinnamon spiced cooking apple with vanilla ice cream.
Overall:
This is a super 'entry level' whisky which is just so easy to drink. I don't
know if it is psychosomatic but it reminds me of the old Johnnie Walker Gold
label. I can see this whisky, at this price point, being a stable in my cabinet
and is a really great example of a classic Speyside whisky.
The Macallan - Amber - 1824 Series
- NAS - 40% abv - around 45 Euro on release.
Nose: Ginger,
melted butter, freshly cut pine underpinned with warm lemon and sugar pancakes.
Palate:
The palate on this expression is far more oily than the gold, giving off
apricots and maple syrup, plums and damsons.
Finish:
Some juniper hints, lemon peel and cinnamon. The flavours in this are almost
Negroni-like.
Overall:
With its Negroni flavours, this whisky would make a great aperitif and should
find real favour in places like France as a pre-dinner perk.
The Macallan - Sienna - 1824
Series - NAS - 43% abv - around £70.00 on release.
Nose: Strong and
robust, the nose gives burnt sugar, some blackcurrants and a hint of marmite of
hot toast as well as a freshly opened tin of floor polish.
Palate:
Allspice, blackcurrants and a huge hit of cherry and dark chocolate. Big and
oily, this palate is full of late summer fruits.
Finish:
Lots of ginger, more blackcurrant and even more black cherry juice.
Overall:
Excellent, full bodied whisky packed with flavour.
The Macallan - Ruby - 1824 Series
- NAS - 43% abv - around £120.00 on release.
Nose: The aroma of freshly roasted coffee beans is
followed by cardamom, fennel and dark chocolate mousse.
Palate: Even more oily and mouth-filling than the
previous whiskies, this has red grapes, fresh figs and some hints of strawberry
jam.
Finish: The red cherry won't give up on this
expression either, but this is much more reduced (in a cooking sense) and gives
a more intense, richer flavour than the Sienna.
Overall:
Same as above, this is an excellent, full bodied whisky packed with flavour.
Well, tasting the range in full, one
can certainly see a clear linage in the intensity of flavour from the Gold though
to the Ruby. Our pick was the Gold which we thought was just a down-right
excellent dram, whatever the (no) age or the colour. The Macallan seem
confident that this new way of talking about whisky, through the medium of
colour, is the right direction for their whiskies and that the consumer will
understand the concept of colour relating to flavour and scarcity.
However, re-educating the consumer
away from age to colour isn't going to be easy. We all know that older whisky
is rarer whisky ("angels' share"
and all that) but will anyone grasp the concept that darker whisky is rarer and
thus more expensive. Take the Aberlour
a'Bunadh: a no age statement, non-chill filtered, non coloured Speyside
single malt whisky that is traditionally a very dark liquid. This currently
retails at £35. But, if we're equating colour to cost and quality, this should be a £125
whisky (if not more). If colour rules and the a'Bunadh is side by side on the
shelf with The Macallan Gold, which does the newly educated consumer choose? Same
price point, same region, both NAS... the perceived value of the brand
notwithstanding, it's a draw on all categories except one: colour. And if
you're asking the consumer to choose on colour, then in that fight there is
only going to be one winner.
At the end of the day, it's the
liquid that matters and our feeling is that the price points for these new
Macallan whiskies are actually pretty fair; I just hope the back story being
told to justify those prices isn't overly complex. Sometimes a nice plain three
piece suit is far more classy than a coat of many colours...
